The Oscars – the movie industry’s event of the year. You know, the one dedicated to movies, movie stars, movie directors, movie producers… the one in which the only time music stars ever get a mention is when they are nominated for the best score and song awards. This is only right considering that the awards have only ever operated in such a tight niche. However, there was a little bit of a crossover this year and that has angered a lot of people. With good reason too.
Farrah Fawcett sadly died of cancer in 2009, although few people will actually remember that given that she died the same day as pop superstar Michael Jackson. The media furore after Jackson’s death overshadowed the death of the TV and movie icon despite her many campaigns to draw attention to women’s cancers and early diagnosis, which was unfair in itself. However, the fact that her peers have not even recognised her is disgusting.
Fawcett did not appear in the roll of honour featuring the acting stars that died last year because apparently she was better known as a TV star. That argument holds in itself because she will be honoured at the Emmys. However, it doesn’t when none other than Michael Jackson features in the roll of honour in her place.
Mention the name Michael Jackson and you think pop star, amongst more negative things. You do not think movie star or even TV star, so why did he feature at the Oscars instead of Fawcett? He was arguably a greater star than she was but that should not detract from her achievements. It is like the Grammys honouring Fawcett, Corey Haim, Heath Ledger, River Phoenix or any number of other movies stars that have died instead of Michael Jackson
The opinion behind the story? I just wish everyone would apply one rule for everybody in the arts world instead of giving some special attention when it is not necessarily always merited.

